I admit I have fallen prey to the temptation that is Instant Netflix. And why not? I can't survive a week bereft of cinema, and in this way I get to watch essential classics without having to wait. But every time without fail I gnash my teeth at my smudged computer screen when the image turns to pixels. Besides the obvious annoyances, though, compacting the film into a narrow screen distorts the message the film is trying to convey in each frame.
To make a film and to produce an overall effect takes a staggering amount of time, effort, and collaboration. In a well-made movie, everything you see in a shot has a purpose, whether it be lighting or costume or ambient noise. No matter how much you increase the lighting, a murky computer screen diminishes these facets.
Why am I making such a big fuss about such a trivial matter? I suppose I'm just sensitive to the artist's plight. I know most students gripe about how English teachers analyze books too much, but to not do so is almost disrespectful to the author; writers don't want you to fling aside their work after a skim -- they want you to ponder over its content. It's the same way with film: to not watch one on a sizable screen is to ignore all the toil the maker underwent to achieve the final product.
No comments:
Post a Comment